<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Low Observable</title>
  <link>https://www.lowobservable.com/</link>
  <description>Seeing the unseen in defense and aerospace.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 16:16:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <atom:link href="https://www.lowobservable.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <item>
    <title>Ghost Stories: Five Contested Radar Sightings of Stealth Aircraft, Examined</title>
    <link>https://www.lowobservable.com/contested-radar-sightings-stealth-aircraft/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lowobservable.com/contested-radar-sightings-stealth-aircraft/</guid>
    <description>Every few years, a claim surfaces that someone&#039;s radar &#039;saw&#039; an American stealth aircraft. Some are exaggerated, some are misread, and a few are genuinely instructive. We sort the physics from the folklore in five of the most-cited cases.</description>
    <author>Low Observable</author>
    <category>History &amp; Analysis</category>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 16:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Heat Is On: Why Infrared Is Stealth&#039;s Uncomfortable Blind Spot</title>
    <link>https://www.lowobservable.com/infrared-signatures-stealth-blind-spot/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lowobservable.com/infrared-signatures-stealth-blind-spot/</guid>
    <description>Radar cross-section numbers dominate the stealth conversation, but heat never got the memo. As IRST sensors proliferate across rival air forces, the infrared signature is becoming the metric that matters — and the one the Pentagon talks about least.</description>
    <author>Low Observable</author>
    <category>Signature Management</category>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 16:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>